- UID
- 5
- 帖子
- 771
- 積分
- 2506
- 威望
- 2506
- 閱讀權限
- 70
- 註冊時間
- 2017-3-27
|
83#
發表於 2018-12-12 22:22
| 只看該作者
本帖最後由 飛毛腿 於 2018-12-12 22:24 編輯
好明顯係佢估香港唔會助日紂為虐,在5G技術上香港冇必要怕,而且只有利。香港幫佢扣人咗,轉頭會玩司法手段 ...
無神論狂徒 發表於 2018-12-12 09:39 AM
香港假髮人雖然好多腦殘同香蕉人
但有上訴機制情況下,未必下下遇著腦殘嘅
只要受過正常嘅法律專業訓練,好難幫老味幫得落手
睇下份無厘頭九嘅逮捕申請書 :
PROVISIONAL ARREST REQUEST FOR WANZHOU MENG
Because Meng and other Huawei representatives misrepresented to Financial Institution I (Note:i.e. HSBC) and other financial institutions about Huawei‘s relationship (Note:not specified but maybe China big 4 banks?) about Huawei’s relationship with Skycom, these victim banking (Note:potential victims) institutions were induced into carrying out transactions that they otherwise woud not have completed. (Note: these banks are supposed to rely only on their own decision to provide service or not based on their DD.) As a result, they violates the banks's internal policies, potentially violates U.S. sanctions laws and exposed the banks to the risk of fines and forfeiture. In particular, these relationships included the clearing of hundreds of millions of U.S.-dollar transactions throguh correspondent accounts at financial institutions in Eurozone countries. In essence, these misrepresentations exposed the financial institutions to serious harm and denied the institutions the opportunity to make decisions based on the true risk of processing certain transaction and the reputations risk associated with banking high-risk clients such as Huawei!
家下要拉孟女嘅理由唔係話華為跟伊朗做生意
係話孟女誤導銀行 ~ 除咗匯豐仲有唔知邊間銀行
these victim banking (Note:potential victims) ~ 所謂受害嘅銀行,唔係真係受害,係可能會受害
因為呢 D銀行 ( 唔知乜叉銀行)可能會違反老味嘅禁令
一份咁無厘頭九嘅莫須有指控就話要拉要鎖孟女
加麻大個腦殘白痴法官仲煞有介事咁聆訊
仲要開出 16項條件先准孟女保釋
迷信英式法律嘅含蝦燦真係可以開下眼界 |
|